DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spinlock: remove volatile qualifier
Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 11:06:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6261630.31tnzDBltd@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260504083714.2904729-1-thomas@monjalon.net>

04/05/2026 10:37, Thomas Monjalon:
> The user and count fields of rte_spinlock_recursive_t
> do not need the volatile qualifier
> because they are only accessed by the thread holding the lock,
> which already provides the necessary memory ordering.
> 
> Removing volatile aligns with a C++20 deprecation
> for increment and decrement of volatile variables.
> 
> This issue was seen with GCC 16 which changes the default C++ version
> from -std=gnu++17 to -std=gnu++20.
> 
> Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>

I've just found this has been discussed 4 years ago:
https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20221221083717.135c3f81@hermes.local

Stephen had found some comments issues that I will fix in another patch.



  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-04  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-04  8:37 [PATCH] spinlock: remove volatile qualifier Thomas Monjalon
2026-05-04  9:06 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2026-05-04  9:12   ` [PATCH] spinlock: fix API comments Thomas Monjalon
2026-05-04 12:46     ` Thomas Monjalon
2026-05-04 17:02 ` [PATCH] spinlock: remove volatile qualifier Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-05  7:01   ` Thomas Monjalon
2026-05-05 13:24     ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6261630.31tnzDBltd@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox