From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver
	Model
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:57:44 +0530
Message-ID: <63b6e872-20bd-1a92-431b-364afdaa2ed0@nxp.com>
References: <1482756644-13726-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
 <1482758645-23057-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
 <8998736.nqQJbzs4a4@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <david.marchand@6wind.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-by2nam01on0071.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.71])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0262B8B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 07:24:17 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <8998736.nqQJbzs4a4@xps13>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wednesday 04 January 2017 03:52 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-12-26 18:53, Shreyansh Jain:
>> Link to v1: [10]
>> Link to v2: [11]
>> Link to v3: [13]
>> Link to v4: [14]
>>
>> :: Introduction ::
>>
>> DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the
>> design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is also PCI inclined. A
>> non-PCI device doesn't have a way of being expressed without using hooks
>> started from EAL to PMD.
>
> It is a very important work to make DPDK growing.
>
> I am sorry to not have done a lot of public comments before today.
> I have sent some thoughts about moving some things from generic objects to
> specialized ones. I think they are not so much big changes in your work
> and I hope we could converge to something in the git tree really soon.

Thanks a lot for spending time on this.
I will reply to all your emails and if possible, with updated code, 
within today (6/Jan)

>
> Thanks Shreyansh.
>
> PS: reviews from others are more than welcome!
>

Yes please. this change impacts framework very widely (even though the 
lines changed is not much). More reviews would really help.