From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] net/mlx5: support upstream rdma-core Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 14:47:14 +0100 Message-ID: <6406a779-1140-65d3-efff-141c66d1739c@intel.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Adrien Mazarguil , Nelio Laranjeiro To: Shachar Beiser , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C65B1041 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:47:17 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 9/14/2017 2:34 PM, Shachar Beiser wrote: > This removes the dependency on specific Mellanox OFED libraries by > using the upstream rdma-core and linux upstream community code. Would you mind mentioning what is the difference between "specific Mellanox OFED libraries" and "upstream rdma-core"? If not in the documentation, at least in mail list for interested people? Does it make sense to put this update into release notes? Thanks, ferruh > > --- > I have squashed : > [PATCH v2 3/3] “net/mlx5: fix interrupt enable return” > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28380/ > into this patch > > a. Compile with rdma-core commit f11292efd541 ("Merge pull request #202") > b. Tested with linux kernel 4.13-rc4 > c. For performance testing recommended to wait till kernel 4.14 > > Signed-off-by: Shachar Beiser <...>