From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] test: add checks for cpu flags on
	armv8
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6645369.r3ghAFd0W5@xps13>
References: <1446212826-19425-7-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
 <5633798B.2050708@intel.com>
 <20151030161106.4657232.16920.465@rehivetech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D419208
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:16:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wmff134 with SMTP id f134so15632572wmf.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20151030161106.4657232.16920.465@rehivetech.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-10-30 17:11, Jan Viktorin:
> Anyway, it is not clear, what has changed in the v3. Just the rte_cycles?
> You should explain that at least in the 0000 patch.
> Better to keep some history in each single commit (are there any rules in
> dpdk for this? Just look how they do in kernel).

The rule is to help reviewers ;)
History in the cover letter is good.
If there are also some history in each patch, it's better.