From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] e1000: enable igb TSO support Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:27:53 +0100 Message-ID: <68867061.5D2SKQkrEC@xps13> References: <1445340132-2630-2-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com> <1445414127-11260-1-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com> <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC0909020A1AE3@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "Wang, Xiao W" Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4BE8D9E for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:29:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so172258631wic.0 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:29:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC0909020A1AE3@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > v4: > > * Added ULL postfix to compare mask of igb_tx_offload. > > > > v3: > > * Removed the "unlikely" in check_tso_para function, for there was no > > obvious performance > > difference, let the branch predictor do the job. > > > > v2: > > * Reworded the old comment about union igb_vlan_macip which was no > > more used. > > > > * Corrected typo in line "There're some limitaions in hardware for TCP > > segmentaion offload". > > > > * Added "unlikely" in check_tso_para function. > > > > v1: > > * Initial version for igb TSO feature. > > > > Wang Xiao W (2): > > e1000: enable igb TSO support > > doc: update release note for igb TSO support > Acked-by: Wenzhuo Lu Applied, thanks