From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tan, Jianfeng" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mempool: add stack (fifo) mempool handler Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 16:34:15 +0800 Message-ID: <68b60537-9523-22a7-e0d2-da9f7790f5a6@intel.com> References: <1462472982-49782-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: David Hunt , olivier.matz@6wind.com Return-path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E952BD5 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 10:34:18 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1462472982-49782-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi David, On 5/6/2016 2:29 AM, David Hunt wrote: > This patch set adds a fifo stack handler to the external mempool > manager. Just a minor confusion for me. Usually, we refer stack as LIFO and queue as FIFO. So is there any particular reason why we call "stack (fifo)" here? Thanks, Jianfeng > > This patch set depends on the 3 part external mempool handler > patch set (v4 of the series): > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/12077/ > which depends on the 36 part patch set for mempool rework > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/12038/ > > David Hunt (2): > mempool: add stack (fifo) mempool handler > test: add autotest for external mempool stack handler > > app/test/test_mempool.c | 26 ++++++ > lib/librte_mempool/Makefile | 1 + > lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_stack.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 181 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_stack.c >