From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb_uio: map dummy dma forcing iommu domain attachment Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:06:38 +0000 Message-ID: <6f31fa21-8de8-961d-e66c-7824c65ab5fc@intel.com> References: <1484742475-41005-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> <67a9fd3b-b7f5-c641-9f59-590155cbd30b@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev To: Alejandro Lucero Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81F4BD28 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 20:06:40 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 2/10/2017 7:03 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 2/8/2017 11:54 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: >> Hi Ferruh, >> >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Ferruh Yigit > > wrote: >> >> Hi Alejandro, >> >> On 1/18/2017 12:27 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: >> > For using a DPDK app when iommu is enabled, it requires to >> > add iommu=pt to the kernel command line. But using igb_uio driver >> > makes DMAR errors because the device has not an IOMMU domain. >> >> Please help to understand the scope of the problem, >> >> >> After reading your reply, I realize I could have explained it better. >> First of all, this is related to SRIOV, exactly when the VFs are created. >> >> >> 1- How can you re-produce the problem? >> >> >> Using a VF from a Intel card by a DPDK app in the host and a kernel >= >> 3.15. Although usually VFs are assigned to VMs, it could also be an >> option to use VFs by the host. >> >> BTW, I did not try to reproduce the problem with an Intel card. I >> triggered this problem with an NFP, but because the problem behind, I >> bet that is going to happen for an Intel one as well. > > I can able to reproduce the problem with ixgbe, by using VF on the host. > > And I verified your patch fixes it, it cause device attached to a vfio > group. I want to send this in a separate mail, since not directly related to your patch, but while I was testing with vfio-pci I get lower numbers comparing to the igb_uio, which is unexpected AFAIK. Most probably I am doing something wrong, but I would like to ask if are you observing same behavior? Thanks, ferruh