From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier Matz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] l2fwd/l3fwd: rework long options parsing Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:59:35 +0100 Message-ID: <6f710163-fb03-a3dd-1520-ff78c07d146a@6wind.com> References: <1479822736-32399-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D120F5592 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:59:41 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1479822736-32399-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, On 11/22/2016 02:52 PM, Olivier Matz wrote: > These 2 patches were part of this RFC, which will not be integrated: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-September/046974.html > > It does not bring any functional change, it just reworks the way long > options are parsed in l2fwd and l3fwd to avoid uneeded strcmp() calls > and to ease the addition of a new long option in the future. > > I send them in case maintainers think it is better this way, but I have > no real need. > > Olivier Matz (2): > l3fwd: rework long options parsing > l2fwd: rework long options parsing > > examples/l2fwd/main.c | 30 +++++++-- > examples/l3fwd/main.c | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > 2 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-) > Sorry, I missed some checkpatch issues. I'll fix them in v2. I'm waiting a bit for other comments, in case of. Olivier