From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] examples: remove unnecessary function calls Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:11:43 +0100 Message-ID: <7157985.Xa4WbqdXfG@xps> References: <005201d372e4$a74cbb10$f5e63130$@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, 'Ferruh Yigit' , 'Pablo de Lara' To: Prashant Bhole Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663BE1041 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:12:15 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <005201d372e4$a74cbb10$f5e63130$@lab.ntt.co.jp> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 12/12/2017 02:00, Prashant Bhole: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com] > > > > On 12/10/2017 11:31 PM, Prashant Bhole wrote: > > > Removed rte_eth_dev_info_get() calls and declaration of struct > > > rte_eth_dev_info where info is not used anymore > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole > > > > Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit > > > > > > At any point in the history were they used? If so, can you please add the commit > > making them unnecessary with "Fixes" tag? > > Ferruh, > Thanks for reviewing. Adding tag in reply. Let me know if v2 needed with the tag. > > Fixes: 81f7ecd934372fc9f592d1322f8eff86350fa4f5 Prashant, this is not the commit making them unnecessary.