From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/56] Solarflare libefx-based PMD Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:34:55 +0100 Message-ID: <7168786.6KYmfbe35F@xps13> References: <1479740470-6723-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> <5d041f12-ec8d-77da-47ac-671eb3a39a5b@solarflare.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Andrew Rybchenko , "Yigit, Ferruh" To: "Mcnamara, John" Return-path: Received: from mail-wj0-f175.google.com (mail-wj0-f175.google.com [209.85.210.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D3D5598 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:34:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f175.google.com with SMTP id v7so9606699wjy.2 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 05:34:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-11-23 09:57, Mcnamara, John: > From: Andrew Rybchenko > > Yes, I have no ICC compilers. I'll try to fix these warnings, but I can't > > be sure without checking it. > > Also we cannot claim ICC supported without building and testing the > > generated binary. > > Hi, > > You can get a copy of ICC with a 30 day evaluation license here: https://software.intel.com/en-us/try-buy-tools I think we should stop having some ICC requirements. That's OK to support it on best effort base but it cannot be a responsibility of developers outside of Intel.