From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH] SDK: Add scripts to initialize DPDK runtime Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:04:43 +0000 Message-ID: <7176fcc8-e350-0b23-3026-7d0c38f481ca@intel.com> References: <1481570642-15138-1-git-send-email-lboccass@brocade.com> <20161212211222.GA50316@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <1481579891.8314.54.camel@brocade.com> <22e6b726-79f5-5c2b-2cc6-b11fba6384c7@canonical.com> <20190117093849.6aaa1a38@hermes.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stefan Bader , Luca Boccassi , "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" To: Stephen Hemminger , Christian Ehrhardt , Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F86288C for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:04:46 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20190117093849.6aaa1a38@hermes.lan> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 1/17/2019 5:38 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:19:00 +0100 > Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > >> Stefans mail got rejected by moderator (??!), reposting FYI as I'm >> subscribed and should autopass the moderation. >> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Stefan Bader >> wrote: >> >>> On 13.12.2016 08:00, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Luca Boccassi >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> If the 2 authors (CC'ed Stefan, the second one) agree and give >>>> permission it could be relicensed to BSD. >>>> >>>> Stefan, Christian, is that OK for you? >>>> >>>> >>>> To re-license it for this purpose is ok for me, I'll ask Stefan later >>> today who >>>> was starting on it before me (and added the License initially). >>>> Thanks for pushing that forward Luca! >>> >>> Ok with me, too. >>> >>> -Stefan >> >> >> > > > The script should detect and favor vfio over igb_uio. > The script won't work right with Mellanox driver > and it won't work right on Azure. > Is this a nack? How to proceed on this one? The patch is in backlog for two years now, keeping it as it is won't help. The options I can think of: 1- Get is with current support and add missing ones later 2- Reject it completely 3- Mark as change request and keep continue discussion with new version Thanks, ferruh