From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marko Kovacevic Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] power: changed unsigned to unsigned int Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:15:39 +0000 Message-ID: <71eacecb-5e2f-e173-3b97-5ca8e99623f6@intel.com> References: <20171128132203.43181-1-marko.kovacevic@intel.com> <20171128141656.GA10272@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.hunt@intel.com To: Bruce Richardson Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385672C55 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:15:43 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20171128141656.GA10272@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" As i saw that many other variables were changed from unsigned to unsigned int and since i was cleaning up the code i thought it would be beneficial to change it now not to cause checkpatch problems or other problems down the line. Marko On 28/11/2017 14:16, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:22:00PM +0000, Marko Kovacevic wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Marko Kovacevic --- > While I know that checkpatch complains about unsigned vs unsigned > int, is there some other reason for making this change wholesale in > the code? > > /Bruce