From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethdev: fix ABI breakage in lro code Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:41:47 +0200 Message-ID: <7256638.4inC2JWGiy@xps13> References: <1436783185-8279-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com> <55BED47A.8030001@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <55BEE3EA.90006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Chao Zhu Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A468F255 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:43:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wicmv11 with SMTP id mv11so125974529wic.0 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 01:43:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55BEE3EA.90006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Chao, The original need was to check with the ABI checker tool that the ABI was not broken on POWER BE by this patch. 2015-08-03 11:45, Chao Zhu: > Confirmed. It can compile on Power8 Big Endian. > Thank you! > > On 2015/8/3 10:39, Chao Zhu wrote: > > > > Really sorry for the delay. > > Originally, I thought the email was to asking the ABI checking tools > > on Power which I'm not so familiar with. So this took me some time to > > find solution. For Power little endian, the build is OK. I'll give > > feedback when I tried Big endian compilation. [...] > >>>>>> I presume the ABI checker stopped complaining about this with the > >>>>>> patch, yes? > >>>>> Hi Neil, > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, I replied about that in the previous thread. > >>>>> > >>>> Thank you, I'll ack as soon as Chao confirms its not a problem on > >>>> ppc Neil