From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Remy Horton Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ethdev: move representor parsing functions Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:38:01 +0100 Message-ID: <73ffc68e-0a1f-de2a-790e-6bd4941fddef@intel.com> References: <20181009021858.19216-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20181009021858.19216-4-thomas@monjalon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gaetan.rivet@6wind.com, ophirmu@mellanox.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com To: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590D41B472 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 14:49:53 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20181009021858.19216-4-thomas@monjalon.net> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 09/10/2018 03:18, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > The functions for representor devargs parsing were static > in the file rte_ethdev.c. > In order to reuse them in the file rte_class_eth.c, > they are moved to the files ethdev_private.c/.h. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon There is overlap between these functions and some of the rte_kvargs_*() functions. Is it feasible/desirable to combine them? ..Remy