From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Remy Horton Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] testpmd: make use of per-PMD TxRx parameters Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 09:49:28 +0100 Message-ID: <7488da21-658e-5cb7-ee9d-56608d5a6782@intel.com> References: <20180321142749.27520-1-remy.horton@intel.com> <20180321142749.27520-5-remy.horton@intel.com> <5922778.WOJhgh4gTO@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, John McNamara , Wenzhuo Lu , Jingjing Wu , Qi Zhang , Beilei Xing , Shreyansh Jain To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD381B646 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:49:33 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <5922778.WOJhgh4gTO@xps> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 31/03/2018 01:01, Thomas Monjalon wrote: [..] >> uint16_t nb_rxd = RTE_TEST_RX_DESC_DEFAULT; /**< Number of RX descriptors. */ >> uint16_t nb_txd = RTE_TEST_TX_DESC_DEFAULT; /**< Number of TX descriptors. */ > > These doxygen comments in the middle of the code are totally useless. Did wonder why they were there. However these lines are existing code, and since testpmd.c uses Doxygen tags extensively, removing them in my view ought to be done via a separate clean-up patch.