From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hemant Agrawal Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] relicense various bits of the dpdk Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 18:19:08 +0530 Message-ID: <74f19e7f-dc0f-ad3b-2a24-bb8260745a79@nxp.com> References: <20171204155557.31915-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <20180201121911.28829-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Monjalon To: Neil Horman , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur01on0069.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.0.69]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2671B173 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:49:23 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20180201121911.28829-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 2/1/2018 5:49 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > Received a note the other day from the Linux Foundation governance board > for DPDK indicating that several files I have copyright on need to be > relicensed to be compliant with the DPDK licensing guidelines. I have > some concerns with some parts of the request, but am not opposed to > other parts. So, for those pieces that we are in consensus on, I'm > proposing that we change their license from BSD 2 clause to 3 clause. > I'm also updating the files to use the SPDX licensing scheme > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman > CC: Hemant Agrawal > CC: Thomas Monjalon > > --- > Change notes > V2) Cleaned up formatting (tmonjalon) > --- > devtools/validate-abi.sh | 32 ++++---------------------------- > lib/librte_compat/rte_compat.h | 31 +++---------------------------- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) > Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal