From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Compiler for Windows Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 23:45:22 +0100 Message-ID: <7824863.MkUOD0j12R@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Mattias =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=F6nnblom?= , Jeff Shaw , stephen@networkplumber.org, dev@dpdk.org To: Jason Messer , Harini Ramakrishnan , Omar Cardona , Ranjit Menon Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5AA1B134 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 23:45:26 +0100 (CET) List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, We need to gather inputs about the pros/cons of the C compilers available for Windows. Interesting criterias could be: - ease of use - availability - standards compliance - performance When the comparison will be complete, we should publish it in the doc/ directory, while porting DPDK to Windows. I start with few data: * gcc|clang on cygwin - not native * gcc/mingw * gcc/mingw-w64 * clang/mingw-w64 * clang --target=x86_64-windows-msvc * icc - not freely available * msvc - native - specific command line - not C99