From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] vhost: unify VhostUserMsg usage Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 16:56:15 +0100 Message-ID: <7fe10407-c03a-1899-d4cc-d4f27833d317@intel.com> References: <153698873346.23049.10966616323159180622.stgit@T460> <153698882681.23049.10483393218056672951.stgit@T460> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Nikolay Nikolaev , maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E0E5F65 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:58:34 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <153698882681.23049.10483393218056672951.stgit@T460> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 15-Sep-18 6:20 AM, Nikolay Nikolaev wrote: > Use the typedef version of struct VhostUserMsg. Also unify the related > parameter name. > > Signed-off-by: Nikolay Nikolaev > --- I'm probably missing some background on this, but according to DPDK coding style guide, typedef structs are to be avoided [1]. [1] https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-18.08/contributing/coding_style.html#typedefs -- Thanks, Anatoly