From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: add tested platforms and nics and OSes
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:06:11 +0100
Message-ID: <8134365.Nub62ngP9K@xps13>
References: <1485160698-5252-1-git-send-email-yulong.pei@intel.com>
 <188971FCDA171749BED5DA74ABF3E6F03B68950B@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <20170209084247.GI28684@autoinstall.dev.6wind.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org, "Xu,
 Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=E9lio?= Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>, "Pei,
 Yulong" <yulong.pei@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com (mail-wr0-f169.google.com
 [209.85.128.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951552C4B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:06:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 89so156107478wrr.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:06:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170209084247.GI28684@autoinstall.dev.6wind.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2017-02-09 09:42, N=E9lio Laranjeiro:
> Hi Yulong, John,
>=20
> I would like to propose a modification on those section to improve
> readability and avoid confusion users can meet while reading it.
> They always think that all the combination written here have been
> tested, main idea is to avoid such situation.
>=20
> You can find the proposition on series [1] and specially the patch [2=
].
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-February/057154.html
> [2] http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/20290/


I agree it is confusing.
It is different to test a Niantic on an Intel CPU with/without AVX512
or on an IBM POWER.