From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] eal: add function to release internal resources Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:55:35 +0100 Message-ID: <8777922.WAhnjB1RAy@xps> References: <1517077877-53654-1-git-send-email-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> <3800883.jMHuFJQnlm@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Varghese, Vipin" To: "Van Haaren, Harry" Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD4F1B28B for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:56:23 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 29/01/2018 12:10, Van Haaren, Harry: > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 10:56 AM > > To: Van Haaren, Harry > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Varghese, Vipin > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] eal: add function to release internal resources > > > > 29/01/2018 11:45, Harry van Haaren: > > > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst > > > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst > > > +Finalizing and Cleanup > > > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > + > > > +During the initialization of EAL resources such as hugepage backed memory > > can be > > > +allocated by core components. The memory allocated during > > ``rte_eal_init()`` > > > +can be released by calling the ``rte_eal_finalize()`` function. Refer to > > the > > > +API documentation for details. > > > > About naming, what is better between > > rte_eal_finalize() and > > rte_eal_cleanup() ? > > I tend to think that "cleanup" is more descriptive. > > Sure cleanup() is fine for me, I'll spin a v3 with the function name change. Harry, it is a real question! If someone thinks "finalize" is better, I would like to hear it because we may use the same wording in more DPDK functions.