From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] virtio-user: add new virtual pci
	driver for virtio
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:31:45 +0800
Message-ID: <87a1a5cd-c07f-f16e-97c6-16648edf3ea3@intel.com>
References: <1446748276-132087-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <1464861277-130265-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <1464861277-130265-7-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <20160606080102.GZ10038@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Huawei Xie <huawei.xie@intel.com>, rich.lane@bigswitch.com,
 mst@redhat.com, nakajima.yoshihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp, p.fedin@samsung.com,
 ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com, mukawa@igel.co.jp, nhorman@tuxdriver.com
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EC72C30
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 10:31:49 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20160606080102.GZ10038@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Yuanhan,


On 6/6/2016 4:01 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:54:36AM +0000, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> +
>> +	desc_addr = (uint64_t)vq->mz->addr;
>> +	avail_addr = desc_addr + vq->vq_nentries * sizeof(struct vring_desc);
>> +	used_addr = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(avail_addr + offsetof(struct vring_avail,
>> +							 ring[vq->vq_nentries]),
>> +				   VIRTIO_PCI_VRING_ALIGN);
>> +
>> +	dev->vrings[queue_idx].num = vq->vq_nentries;
>> +	dev->vrings[queue_idx].desc = (void *)desc_addr;
>> +	dev->vrings[queue_idx].avail = (void *)avail_addr;
>> +	dev->vrings[queue_idx].used = (void *)used_addr;
> That would break 32 bit build. please also do more build and function
> test, with and without CONFIG_RTE_VIRTIO_VDEV enabled, to make sure
> we will not break anything. I'm sure you will meet build error without
> that option enabled.

Yes, thanks for pointing this out.

>
> BTW, let's be consistent with using VIRTIO_USER_DEV instead of VDEV
> or VIRTIO_VDEV?

OK.

>
> Another thing that might be a bit late to ask is that how about
> removing the vhost-net support? I mean, it's DPDK; if user stick
> to using DPDK virtio-user, he will stick to using DPDK vhost-user
> as well, but not the vhost-net. So, let's keep it being simple
> first. And if there is really a need for vhost-net, we can add it
> back later, easily. Makes sense?

Yes, it makes sense, because from an initial test, I see low 
performance. Or anyone who are willing to use it can comment?

Thanks,
Jianfeng
>
> I also would suggest you do a rebase based on my latest tree.

No problem.

Thanks,
Jianfeng

>
> 	--yliu