From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] eal/bus: introduce bus abstraction
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 09:37:32 +0530
Message-ID: <88b5bc10-2294-d69c-149d-45250a927e10@nxp.com>
References: <1482756644-13726-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
 <1482758645-23057-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
 <1482758645-23057-2-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
 <f2e2cc0c-a797-0143-b53a-fda6bed9dccf@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <david.marchand@6wind.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>, <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-eopbgr730065.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.73.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65B928F3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 05:04:06 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <f2e2cc0c-a797-0143-b53a-fda6bed9dccf@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hello Ferruh,

On Monday 09 January 2017 08:52 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 12/26/2016 1:23 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>
> <...>
>
>> +
>> +DPDK_17.02 {
>> +	global:
>> +
>> +	rte_bus_list;
>> +	rte_eal_bus_add_device;
>> +	rte_eal_bus_add_driver;
>> +	rte_eal_bus_get;
>> +	rte_eal_bus_dump;
>> +	rte_eal_bus_register;
>
>> +	rte_eal_bus_insert_device;
>
> This function added in patch 3/12, it can be good to add this function
> into .map file in that patch.

Yes, I caught this while rebasing for v6. In fact, now this function 
itself has been removed.
Nevertheless, thanks for reviewing.

>
> <...>
>
>

-
Shreyansh