From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kcp: add kernel control path kernel
	module
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:51:39 -0600
Message-ID: <8DB31F24-8002-4A38-BFD6-B6829EE7CEE0@netgate.com>
References: <1453911849-16562-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
 <56D420E5.9010802@intel.com> <56D42462.3020905@scylladb.com>
 <1945473.Tiatd2m80T@xps13>
 <CADNuJVof3FmLHsJG2MkViLpF0dr28PB6NZdVC7=vB+ZExHfO3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160301180255.3ef1a17e@xeon-e3> <56D6A40F.80003@redhat.com>
 <56D6C4BB.3070904@6wind.com>
 <15052233-E5BF-48F8-8EDB-BEE1868B20D9@netgate.com>
 <56D6D692.7060704@6wind.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>, DPDK <dev@dpdk.org>
To: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com (mail-ob0-f179.google.com
 [209.85.214.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F3E29C6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  2 Mar 2016 23:51:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id xx9so3765677obc.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 14:51:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56D6D692.7060704@6wind.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>


> On Mar 2, 2016, at 6:03 AM, Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com> wrot=
e:
>=20
> Le 02/03/2016 11:51, Jim Thompson a =C3=A9crit :
>> Can we take it as a requirement to support FreeBSD this time around?
>=20
> Of course, all OS should be on the loop, but I guess, it would be per kern=
el specific. What is ethtool on FreeBSD?

Ifconfig

> Or can you start porting ethtool on FreeBSD?

With netlink?  Hmm.=20

I'm more interested in what kni (or its replacement) provides for an interfa=
ce in/out  of the kernel stack ("slow path") on FreeBSD.=20=