From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/6] add Tx preparation
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:50:21 +0000
Message-ID: <8d1ffaf2-0dd3-c3d7-c6ed-78566c12cf7f@intel.com>
References: <1477486575-25148-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>
 <D4643DF5.B8241%Harish.Patil@cavium.com>
 <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0E2444@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <3517413.XL3bTbAyaC@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jan Medala <jan@semihalf.com>,
 Jakub Palider <jpa@semihalf.com>,
 Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>,
 Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>, Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>,
 "Kulasek, TomaszX" <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>,
 Netanel Belgazal <netanel@amazon.com>, Evgeny Schemeilin <evgenys@amazon.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3243C558C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  1 Dec 2016 11:50:24 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <3517413.XL3bTbAyaC@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 11/30/2016 6:26 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-11-30 17:42, Ananyev, Konstantin:
>>>> Please, we need a comment for each driver saying
>>>> "it is OK, we do not need any checksum preparation for TSO"
>>>> or
>>>> "yes we have to implement tx_prepare or TSO will not work in this mode"
>>>>
>>>
>>> qede PMD doesn’t currently support TSO yet, it only supports Tx TCP/UDP/IP
>>> csum offloads.
>>> So Tx preparation isn’t applicable. So as of now -
>>> "it is OK, we do not need any checksum preparation for TSO"
>>
>> Thanks for the answer.
>> Though please note that it not only for TSO.
> 
> Oh yes, sorry, my wording was incorrect.
> We need to know if any checksum preparation is needed prior
> offloading its final computation to the hardware or driver.
> So the question applies to TSO and simple checksum offload.
> 
> We are still waiting answers for
> 	bnxt, cxgbe, ena, nfp, thunderx, virtio and vmxnet3.
> 

Remaining ones:

ena
nfp
virtio
vmxnet3