From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [memnic PATCH 1/7] guest: memnic-tester: PMD benchmark in guest Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:10:51 +0200 Message-ID: <9049135.zKavqy3ols@xps13> References: <7F861DC0615E0C47A872E6F3C5FCDDBD011A98C5@BPXM14GP.gisp.nec.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org, Hayato Momma To: Hiroshi Shimamoto Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7F861DC0615E0C47A872E6F3C5FCDDBD011A98C5-ZmjkEB1lVlLt6d3pZDjeaEtBU8KWyXPq@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" Hi Hiroshi, 2014-09-11 07:46, Hiroshi Shimamoto: > master |<- put packets ->| |<- get packets ->| > slave | |<- rx packets ->|<- tx packets ->| | > |<----------------- set ----------------->| > > Measuring how many sets in the certain period, that represents > the MEMNIC PMD performance. The master workload must be very low. Sorry, I don't really understand this diagram and the associated explanation. Could you try to reword it? Thanks -- Thomas