From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: Initial implementation of PQoS EAL extension Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:41:07 +0100 Message-ID: <91026831.UvMIbM9v17@xps13> References: <5212003.dKKWlXxaE8@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "Kantecki, Tomasz" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197352965 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:42:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id g62so231631267wme.1 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:42:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-02-23 10:03, Kantecki, Tomasz: > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > > Are you OK with concept behind V2 PQoS patch as described above? > > > > So you mean that PQoS don't really need some DPDK integration? > > You just want to show how to use it with DPDK? > > You are correct. The technology can be used without tight DPDK integration but will require users to reach out to existing open source code. > Based on received feedback about EAL PQoS extensions we backed off to sort of a sample code. If there is nothing specific in DPDK for PQos, why writing an example in DPDK? Maybe the example should be better in the library itself. I suggest to mention the library in doc/guides/linux_gsg/nic_perf_intel_platform.rst