From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Thompson Subject: Re: GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 22:25:00 -0500 Message-ID: <924D0FD1-4A1F-4C3E-929C-38C29AED61D7@netgate.com> References: <20150501164512.GB27756@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20150501173108.GA24714@mhcomputing.net> <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E602860466B524@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20150504174857.GA27496@mhcomputing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: "Wiles, Keith" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" > On May 4, 2015, at 10:12 PM, Wiles, Keith = wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 5/4/15, 10:48 AM, "Matthew Hall" wrote: >=20 >> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:43:48PM +0000, Qiu, Michael wrote: >>> What mail client do you use? I think mail client supporting thread = mode >>> is important for patch review. >>=20 >> Like many UNIX people, I use mutt. >>=20 >> My concern is that, if we're making the widespread adoption, usage, = and >> contributions for DPDK dependent on selection or debate of the = features >> of=20 >> various MUAs, I'm not sure that we're looking at this from the right >> angle. >>=20 >> I'm just trying to figure out how to get DPDK in the place where the = most >> eyeballs are, rather than trying to drag the eyeballs to the place = where >> DPDK=20 >> is. >=20 > +1, I agree with this statement completely and I feel discussions = about an > MUA is non-productive and out of scope. +1. I=E2=80=99ve avoided the whole discussion, because =E2=80=A6 ok, = =E2=80=9Cnon-productive and out of scope=E2=80=9D is a polite way of = saying it. jim