From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: DPDK patchwork upgrade Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 19:01:47 +0200 Message-ID: <9398822.xtO6cvAGR1@xps13> References: <1736050.3Z5tnqk6B6@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , Stephen Finucane Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CE68E7F for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 19:01:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id i204so96837221wma.0 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 10:01:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-09-07 16:40, De Lara Guarch, Pablo: > I am looking at it, and I see two issues: > - There are some patches that have been acked, but I don't see that in patchwork > (e.g. http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/15381/) Yes the new columns are empty. I guess they will be filled starting from now. Stephen, could we re-parse old emails (from August/September) to fill A/R/T without breaking the database? > - Is there any way to see if patches in a patchset have been acked? > Usually, patchsets are acked by replying to the cover letter, > but this is not going to be reflected in Patchwork, correct? Yes, I think the next version of patchwork will support series and cover letter parsing. Maybe we could also be able to check the message id of a previous cover letter before sending a new version of a series?