From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/intel: optimize for fast-free hint
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 13:05:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F65694@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260123112032.2174361-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
I haven't looked into the details yet, but have a quick question inline below.
> @@ -345,12 +345,20 @@ ci_txq_release_all_mbufs(struct ci_tx_queue *txq,
> bool use_ctx)
> return;
>
> if (!txq->vector_tx) {
> - for (uint16_t i = 0; i < txq->nb_tx_desc; i++) {
> - if (txq->sw_ring[i].mbuf != NULL) {
You changed this loop to only operate on not-yet-cleaned descriptors.
Here comes the first part of my question:
You removed the NULL check for txq->sw_ring[i].mbuf, thereby assuming that it is never NULL for not-yet-cleaned descriptors.
> + /* Free mbufs from (last_desc_cleaned + 1) to (tx_tail -
> 1). */
> + const uint16_t start = (txq->last_desc_cleaned + 1) % txq-
> >nb_tx_desc;
> + const uint16_t nb_desc = txq->nb_tx_desc;
> + const uint16_t end = txq->tx_tail;
> +
> + uint16_t i = start;
> + if (end < i) {
> + for (; i < nb_desc; i++)
> rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(txq->sw_ring[i].mbuf);
> - txq->sw_ring[i].mbuf = NULL;
> - }
> + i = 0;
> }
> + for (; i < end; i++)
> + rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(txq->sw_ring[i].mbuf);
> + memset(txq->sw_ring, 0, sizeof(txq->sw_ring[0]) * nb_desc);
> return;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/common/tx_scalar_fns.h
> b/drivers/net/intel/common/tx_scalar_fns.h
> index 82dc54438f..47ddcf411b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/common/tx_scalar_fns.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/common/tx_scalar_fns.h
> @@ -30,16 +30,60 @@ ci_tx_xmit_cleanup(struct ci_tx_queue *txq)
> const uint16_t rs_idx = (last_desc_cleaned == nb_tx_desc - 1) ?
> 0 :
> (last_desc_cleaned + 1) >> txq->log2_rs_thresh;
> - uint16_t desc_to_clean_to = (rs_idx << txq->log2_rs_thresh) +
> (txq->tx_rs_thresh - 1);
> + const uint16_t dd_idx = txq->rs_last_id[rs_idx];
> + const uint16_t first_to_clean = rs_idx << txq->log2_rs_thresh;
>
> /* Check if descriptor is done - all drivers use 0xF as done
> value in bits 3:0 */
> - if ((txd[txq->rs_last_id[rs_idx]].cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> rte_cpu_to_le_64(CI_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_M)) !=
> + if ((txd[dd_idx].cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> rte_cpu_to_le_64(CI_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_M)) !=
> rte_cpu_to_le_64(CI_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE))
> /* Descriptor not yet processed by hardware */
> return -1;
>
> + /* DD bit is set, descriptors are done. Now free the mbufs. */
> + /* Note: nb_tx_desc is guaranteed to be a multiple of
> tx_rs_thresh,
> + * validated during queue setup. This means cleanup never wraps
> around
> + * the ring within a single burst (e.g., ring=256, rs_thresh=32
> gives
> + * bursts of 0-31, 32-63, ..., 224-255).
> + */
> + const uint16_t nb_to_clean = txq->tx_rs_thresh;
> + struct ci_tx_entry *sw_ring = txq->sw_ring;
> +
> + if (txq->offloads & RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE) {
> + /* FAST_FREE path: mbufs are already reset, just return to
> pool */
> + uint16_t nb_free = 0;
> +
> + /* Get cached mempool pointer, or cache it on first use */
> + struct rte_mempool *mp =
> + likely(txq->fast_free_mp != (void *)UINTPTR_MAX) ?
> + txq->fast_free_mp :
> + (txq->fast_free_mp = sw_ring[dd_idx].mbuf->pool);
> +
> + /* Pack non-NULL mbufs in-place at start of sw_ring range.
Here is the second part of my question:
How can they (sw_ring[X].mbuf) be NULL here, when they cannot be NULL in ci_txq_release_all_mbufs()?
> + * No modulo needed in loop since we're guaranteed not to
> wrap.
> + */
> + for (uint16_t i = 0; i < nb_to_clean; i++) {
> + struct rte_mbuf *m = sw_ring[first_to_clean +
> i].mbuf;
> + if (m != NULL) {
> + /* Pack into sw_ring at packed position */
> + sw_ring[first_to_clean + nb_free].mbuf = m;
> + nb_free++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Bulk return to mempool using packed sw_ring entries
> directly */
> + if (nb_free > 0)
> + rte_mempool_put_bulk(mp, (void
> **)&sw_ring[first_to_clean].mbuf, nb_free);
> + } else {
> + /* Non-FAST_FREE path: use prefree_seg for refcount checks
> */
> + for (uint16_t i = 0; i < nb_to_clean; i++) {
> + struct rte_mbuf *m = sw_ring[first_to_clean +
> i].mbuf;
> + if (m != NULL)
> + rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(m);
> + }
> + }
> +
> /* Update the txq to reflect the last descriptor that was cleaned
> */
> - txq->last_desc_cleaned = desc_to_clean_to;
> + txq->last_desc_cleaned = first_to_clean + txq->tx_rs_thresh - 1;
> txq->nb_tx_free += txq->tx_rs_thresh;
>
> return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-23 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-15 11:06 mbuf fast-free requirements analysis Morten Brørup
2025-12-15 11:46 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-01-14 15:31 ` Morten Brørup
2026-01-14 16:36 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-01-14 18:05 ` Morten Brørup
2026-01-15 8:46 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-01-15 9:04 ` Morten Brørup
2026-01-23 11:20 ` [PATCH] net/intel: optimize for fast-free hint Bruce Richardson
2026-01-23 12:05 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2026-01-23 12:09 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-01-23 12:27 ` Morten Brørup
2026-01-23 12:53 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-01-23 13:06 ` Morten Brørup
2026-04-08 13:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2026-04-08 19:27 ` Morten Brørup
2026-01-23 11:33 ` mbuf fast-free requirements analysis Bruce Richardson
2025-12-15 14:41 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-12-15 16:14 ` Morten Brørup
2025-12-19 17:08 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-12-20 7:33 ` Morten Brørup
2025-12-22 15:22 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-12-22 17:11 ` Morten Brørup
2025-12-22 17:43 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-01-13 14:48 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-01-13 16:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-14 17:01 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-01-14 17:31 ` Morten Brørup
2026-01-14 17:45 ` Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F65694@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox