From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Robin Jarry" <rjarry@redhat.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH dpdk] net/tap: add software MAC address filtering
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 11:10:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F657AB@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319221034.703656-2-rjarry@redhat.com>
> +static inline bool
> +tap_mac_filter_match(struct rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
> +{
> + struct pmd_internals *pmd = rxq->pmd;
> + struct rte_eth_dev_data *data;
> + struct rte_ether_addr *dst;
> + uint32_t i;
> +
> + if (!pmd->macfilter)
> + return true;
> +
> + data = pmd->dev->data;
> + if (data->promiscuous)
> + return true;
> +
> + dst = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, struct rte_ether_addr *);
> +
> + if (rte_is_broadcast_ether_addr(dst))
> + return true;
> +
> + if (rte_is_multicast_ether_addr(dst)) {
> + if (data->all_multicast)
> + return true;
> + for (i = 0; i < pmd->nb_mc_addrs; i++) {
> + if (rte_is_same_ether_addr(dst, &pmd->mc_addrs[i]))
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < TAP_MAX_MAC_ADDRS; i++) {
> + if (rte_is_zero_ether_addr(&data->mac_addrs[i]))
> + continue;
> + if (rte_is_same_ether_addr(dst, &data->mac_addrs[i]))
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
Performance optimization; the vast majority of packets are unicast:
if (likely(rte_is_unicast_ether_addr(dst)) {
if (unlikely(rte_is_zero_ether_addr(dst)))
return false; /* Invalid destination address in packet */
/* Note: Compiler loop unrolls. */
for (i = 0; i < TAP_MAX_MAC_ADDRS; i++) {
if (rte_is_same_ether_addr(dst, &data->mac_addrs[i]))
return true;
}
}
if (data->all_multicast)
return true;
for (i = 0; i < pmd->nb_mc_addrs; i++) {
if (rte_is_same_ether_addr(dst, &pmd->mc_addrs[i]))
return true;
}
if (rte_is_broadcast_ether_addr(dst))
return true;
return false;
Also, all the variables and function parameters could be "const"; although I don't know if it makes any practical difference.
> static int
> -tap_set_mc_addr_list(struct rte_eth_dev *dev __rte_unused,
> - struct rte_ether_addr *mc_addr_set __rte_unused,
> - uint32_t nb_mc_addr __rte_unused)
> +tap_set_mc_addr_list(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> + struct rte_ether_addr *mc_addr_set,
> + uint32_t nb_mc_addr)
> {
> - /*
> - * Nothing to do actually: the tap has no filtering whatsoever,
> every
> - * packet is received.
> - */
> + struct pmd_internals *pmd = dev->data->dev_private;
> +
> + if (nb_mc_addr == 0) {
> + rte_free(pmd->mc_addrs);
> + pmd->mc_addrs = NULL;
> + pmd->nb_mc_addrs = 0;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + pmd->mc_addrs = rte_realloc(pmd->mc_addrs,
> + nb_mc_addr * sizeof(*pmd->mc_addrs), 0);
> + if (pmd->mc_addrs == NULL) {
> + pmd->nb_mc_addrs = 0;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(pmd->mc_addrs, mc_addr_set,
> + nb_mc_addr * sizeof(*pmd->mc_addrs));
> + pmd->nb_mc_addrs = nb_mc_addr;
> +
> return 0;
> }
This is not thread safe.
If it needs to be thread safe, you must ensure that tap_mac_filter_match() - running on another lcore - is done using the mc_addrs array before you free it here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-20 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 22:10 [PATCH dpdk] net/tap: add software MAC address filtering Robin Jarry
2026-03-19 22:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-20 8:26 ` Robin Jarry
2026-03-20 10:10 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2026-03-20 16:45 ` [PATCH dpdk v2] " Robin Jarry
2026-03-21 2:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-21 5:48 ` Morten Brørup
2026-03-21 14:48 ` [PATCH dpdk v3] " Robin Jarry
2026-03-21 17:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-21 23:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-23 8:42 ` [PATCH dpdk v4] " Robin Jarry
2026-03-23 18:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-24 19:09 ` [PATCH dpdk v5] " Robin Jarry
2026-03-25 16:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-26 9:15 ` Robin Jarry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F657AB@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=rjarry@redhat.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox