public inbox for dev@dpdk.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Long Li" <longli@microsoft.com>,
	"Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Robin Jarry" <rjarry@redhat.com>,
	"Hemant Agrawal" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"Maxime Leroy" <maxime@leroys.fr>,
	"Kevin Traynor" <ktraynor@redhat.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
	<matan@nvidia.com>, "Wei Hu" <weh@microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Rework device probing
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 09:30:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F657E1@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <LV0PR21MB6670C8CFBCD121494E58FEE2CE592@LV0PR21MB6670.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>

> From: Long Li [mailto:longli@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Friday, 10 April 2026 23.14
> 
> > On Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:34:56 +0200
> > Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a workaround until this patch is added, if I don't want
> rte_eal_init() to
> > probe any devices, but I want my application to probe devices later
> by calling
> > rte_bus_scan() followed by rte_bus_probe()?
> > >
> > > It's not something we really need, so if you don't know it off the
> top of your
> > head, don't spend time trying to figure it out.
> > >
> > >
> > > Venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
> > > -Morten Brørup
> >
> > We do need it because of the problems with vdev_netvsc.
> > The issue is that vdev_netvsc tries to setup failsafe on all netvsc
> devices it sees,
> > and it determines which ones are used by OS based on somewhat fragile
> OS
> > probes with netlink.
> >
> > I would recommend getting rid of vdev_netvsc, or make the the auto
> scanning
> > there something that has to be forced by devargs.
> > But that really is up to the netvsc maintainers.
> 
> Hi Morten,
> 
> Can you use --vdev=net_vdev_netvsc,ignore=1? The ignore devarg is
> already supported by the vdev_netvsc PMD — when set, the probe function
> skips all netvsc interface discovery and returns early.
> 
> Long

Thanks for the suggestion, Long.
I'm not looking for a netvsc solution, I'm looking for a general solution to not probe any drivers at EAL initialization, but at a later stage, controlled by the application.

-Morten


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-11  7:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-23 10:52 [PATCH 0/8] Rework device probing David Marchand
2026-03-23 10:52 ` [PATCH 1/8] devtools: check packet forwarding in null test David Marchand
2026-03-23 10:52 ` [PATCH 2/8] bus/fslmc: fix bus cleanup David Marchand
2026-03-23 16:59   ` Kevin Traynor
2026-03-26  8:22     ` David Marchand
2026-03-26  8:49       ` Kevin Traynor
2026-03-24  5:15   ` Hemant Agrawal
2026-03-24  5:15   ` Hemant Agrawal
2026-03-23 10:52 ` [PATCH 3/8] drivers/bus: require probe function for NXP drivers David Marchand
2026-03-23 16:59   ` Kevin Traynor
2026-03-24  5:15   ` Hemant Agrawal
2026-03-23 10:52 ` [PATCH 4/8] drivers: cleanup devargs lookup in bus scan David Marchand
2026-03-24  5:16   ` Hemant Agrawal
2026-03-24 14:13   ` Kevin Traynor
2026-03-24 16:10   ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-23 10:52 ` [PATCH 5/8] bus: factorize devargs lookup David Marchand
2026-03-24 14:16   ` Kevin Traynor
2026-03-24 16:11   ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-23 10:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] bus: factorize device selection David Marchand
2026-03-24 14:15   ` Kevin Traynor
2026-03-26  8:48     ` David Marchand
2026-03-24 16:12   ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-23 10:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] bus: remove per bus scan mode David Marchand
2026-03-24 16:02   ` Kevin Traynor
2026-03-24 16:27     ` Kevin Traynor
2026-03-26  8:54     ` David Marchand
2026-03-23 10:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] eal: configure initial device probing David Marchand
2026-03-25 10:57   ` Kevin Traynor
2026-03-24  5:17 ` [PATCH 0/8] Rework " Hemant Agrawal
2026-03-25 15:22 ` Maxime Leroy
2026-03-26 10:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " David Marchand
2026-03-26 10:24   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] devtools: check packet forwarding in null test David Marchand
2026-03-26 10:24   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] bus/fslmc: fix bus cleanup David Marchand
2026-03-26 11:50     ` Kevin Traynor
2026-03-26 10:24   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drivers/bus: require probe function for NXP drivers David Marchand
2026-03-26 10:24   ` [PATCH v2 4/7] drivers: cleanup devargs lookup in bus scan David Marchand
2026-03-28  3:13     ` fengchengwen
2026-03-26 10:24   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] bus: factorize devargs lookup David Marchand
2026-03-26 11:51     ` Kevin Traynor
2026-03-28  3:33     ` fengchengwen
2026-04-03 14:22       ` David Marchand
2026-03-26 10:24   ` [PATCH v2 6/7] bus: factorize device selection David Marchand
2026-03-26 11:52     ` Kevin Traynor
2026-03-28  3:38     ` fengchengwen
2026-03-26 10:24   ` [PATCH v2 7/7] eal: configure initial device probing David Marchand
2026-03-28  4:00     ` fengchengwen
2026-04-03 14:25       ` David Marchand
2026-04-07 11:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Rework " David Marchand
2026-04-07 11:52   ` [PATCH v3 1/7] devtools: check packet forwarding in null test David Marchand
2026-04-07 11:52   ` [PATCH v3 2/7] bus/fslmc: fix bus cleanup David Marchand
2026-04-07 11:52   ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drivers/bus: require probe function for NXP drivers David Marchand
2026-04-07 11:52   ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drivers/bus: cleanup devargs lookup in scan David Marchand
2026-04-07 11:52   ` [PATCH v3 5/7] bus: factorize devargs lookup David Marchand
2026-04-08  1:18     ` fengchengwen
2026-04-07 11:52   ` [PATCH v3 6/7] bus: factorize device selection David Marchand
2026-04-07 11:52   ` [PATCH v3 7/7] eal: configure initial device probing David Marchand
2026-04-08  1:44     ` fengchengwen
2026-04-07 11:58   ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Rework " David Marchand
2026-04-07 15:12   ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-04-10 14:34   ` Morten Brørup
2026-04-10 15:16     ` Kevin Traynor
2026-04-10 17:37     ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-04-10 21:13       ` [EXTERNAL] " Long Li
2026-04-10 22:50         ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-04-11  7:30         ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2026-04-11 10:10     ` David Marchand
2026-04-11 10:23       ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F657E1@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
    --to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=longli@microsoft.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=maxime@leroys.fr \
    --cc=rjarry@redhat.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=weh@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox