From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Wu, Jingjing" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: fix ixgbevf RX/TX function assignment Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 05:30:12 +0000 Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8DCDF79@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1456672050-21115-1-git-send-email-zhe.tao@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: "Tao, Zhe" , "dev@dpdk.org" Return-path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF3E2BA8 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 06:30:16 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1456672050-21115-1-git-send-email-zhe.tao@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhe Tao > Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:08 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix ixgbevf RX/TX function assignment >=20 > For the secondary process of DPDK to initialize ixgbevf, it will always > use the simple RX function or LRO RX function, and this behavior is not > the same RX/TX function selection logic as it is for the primary process, > so use the ixgbe_set_tx_function and ixgbe_set_rx_function to select the > RX/TX function when secondary process call the init function for eth dev. Fixes line is missing here.