From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] examples/power: remove mask functions
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:30:44 +0000
Message-ID: <9f0813fc-309f-33bf-1b74-ecb89392634f@intel.com>
References: <20181122170220.55482-1-david.hunt@intel.com>
 <20181122170220.55482-3-david.hunt@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: lei.a.yao@intel.com
To: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBAD5F1F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:30:47 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <20181122170220.55482-3-david.hunt@intel.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 22-Nov-18 5:02 PM, David Hunt wrote:
> since we're moving to allowing greater than 64 cores, the mask functions
> that use uint64_t to perform functions on a masked set of cores are no
> longer feasable, so removing them.

Perhaps "needed" is a better word, rather than "feasible" :)

Please correct me if i'm wrong, but as of this patch, some of the 
functionality is left in half-working state, and this patch should 
really be merged with patch 3?

-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly