From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Ehrhardt Subject: Question regarding mempool changes impact to XEN PMD Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:34:51 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: David Marchand , dev Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f180.google.com (mail-qk0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973D847CE for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:35:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk0-f180.google.com with SMTP id p10so34674027qke.3 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:35:11 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi David, it seems to be the first time I compiled with CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT=3Dy sinec the bigger mempool changes around "587d684d doc: update release notes about mempool allocation". I've seen related patch to mempool / xen in that regard "c042ba20 mempool: rework support of Xen dom0" But with above config symbol enabled I got: drivers/net/xenvirt/rte_xen_lib.c: In function =E2=80=98grant_gntalloc_mbuf= _pool=E2=80=99: drivers/net/xenvirt/rte_xen_lib.c:440:69: error: =E2=80=98struct rte_mempoo= l=E2=80=99 has no member named =E2=80=98elt_va_start=E2=80=99 if (snprintf(val_str, sizeof(val_str), "%"PRIxPTR, (uintptr_t)mpool->elt_va_start) =3D=3D -1) ^ SYMLINK-FILE include/rte_eth_bond.h mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:126: recipe for target 'rte_xen_lib.o' faile= d make[4]: *** [rte_xen_lib.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... The change around the mempools is complex, so I don't see on the first look if that needs a minor or major rework in the xen sources. I mean I don't want it to compile, but to work and that could be more than just fixing that changed structure :-) So I wanted to ask if you as author would see if it is a trivial change that has to be made? Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd