From: Selvaganapathy Chidambaram <selvaganapathyc-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Daniel Kan <dan-nm7580oGLDTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" <dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Selecting Linux distribution for DPDK applications: CentOS or Debian
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:39:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAB3M1-ERQ=Gtn6W2XmffMqEXNmFT0brUaFGDbTQv5KumH55Kvw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21607DF1-D798-41C1-B5E7-E9CC6CE53B4C-nm7580oGLDTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Hi Daniel,
virtio-net-pmd (dpdk-1.5) works on CentOS 6.x . Just verified basic packet
flow with one queue.
Thanks,
Selvaganapathy.C.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Daniel Kan <dan-nm7580oGLDTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the all the feedbacks. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS has 3.8.x kernel and
> Fedcore 18 has 3.10.x kernel. Both kernels are not compatible with the
> vmxnet-usermap driver which supports only up to 3.2.x. virtio-net-pmd
> requires kernel 3.8.x and qemu 1.5 for multi-queue support. Since CentOS's
> kernel is on its own path, I'm wondering if anyone has any issue with
> virtio-net-pmd on CentOS 6.x.
>
> Prashant, CentOS is essentially the same as RHEL 6.3 minus the support.
>
> Dan
>
> On Jan 30, 2014, at 6:06 AM, Hamed khanmirza <hamedkh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > We are also using Debian 7.3, from the DPDK v1.3.1 up to version 1.5.1r1.
> > it works completely fine.
> >
> > regards,
> > - Hamed
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Daniel Kaminsky <
> > daniel.kaminsky-bIuJOMs36akdlAAv9/cgxFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> >> We're using CentOS 6.5 and Ubuntu 12.04 and don't see any issue with
> both
> >> of them.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Daniel Kaminsky
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya <
> >> prashant.upadhyaya-pccXkzZloW5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Dan,
> >>>
> >>> Intel DPDK release notes(1.5.2) mention the following tested OS --
> >>> * Fedora release 18
> >>> * Ubuntu* 12.04 LTS
> >>> * Wind River* Linux* 5
> >>> * Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 6.3
> >>> * SUSE Enterprise Linux* 11 SP2
> >>>
> >>> I have personally used Fedora 18 and it works fine for me for
> >>> virtualization including SRIOV and pass through as well as virtio with
> >> KNI
> >>> backend.
> >>> So I am tending to stick to Fedora 18.
> >>>
> >>> I don't know why is CentOS not tested and mentioned in release notes.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> -Prashant
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Kan
> >>> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 2:01 PM
> >>> To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
> >>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Selecting Linux distribution for DPDK applications:
> >>> CentOS or Debian
> >>>
> >>> I'm deciding between Debian 7.3 (3.2.0 kernel) and CentOS 6.5 (2.6.32
> >>> kernel) for production. I'm wondering if anyone has recommendation. We
> >> run
> >>> the DPDK application in a virtualized environment. Currently, we
> >> configure
> >>> NICs in pass-through mode which gives the best performance. In the
> >> future,
> >>> we plan to use DPDK with paravirtualized nics (eg. vmxnet3-usermap).
> >> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Dan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> ===============================================================================
> >>> Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
> >>> for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> ===============================================================================
> >>>
> >>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-30 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-30 8:30 Selecting Linux distribution for DPDK applications: CentOS or Debian Daniel Kan
[not found] ` <886FB96F-B46C-4129-A609-D80E5D1B2B5E-nm7580oGLDTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-30 10:12 ` Prashant Upadhyaya
[not found] ` <C7CE7EEF248E2B48BBA63D0ABEEE700C5A2A24F976-2zbAqoMm/rLQX//ci7WS+53eMK7GYZcrXYFosVITYPE@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-30 12:10 ` Daniel Kaminsky
[not found] ` <CA+8v-JxV=F_3NfgRYxu+ziHS3+r3XtxfEqk1f4B97NS-yHJC-w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-30 14:06 ` Hamed khanmirza
[not found] ` <CALSoDghMKizw9a-M7m86oqKvzLDqWm47a+1RknMAfd0KYWto4g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-30 19:32 ` Daniel Kan
[not found] ` <21607DF1-D798-41C1-B5E7-E9CC6CE53B4C-nm7580oGLDTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-30 19:39 ` Selvaganapathy Chidambaram [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAB3M1-ERQ=Gtn6W2XmffMqEXNmFT0brUaFGDbTQv5KumH55Kvw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=selvaganapathyc-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dan-nm7580oGLDTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).