From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ajit Khaparde Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] bnxt patchset Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:44:51 -0700 Message-ID: References: <95301884-14c8-bbfd-ade9-ded04bdb6a95@intel.com> <20180929020006.71505-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> <5cbb67b1-320d-f4ba-898d-7b7bf7921984@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Ferruh Yigit Return-path: Received: from mail-oi1-f194.google.com (mail-oi1-f194.google.com [209.85.167.194]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBAD1B0FD for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 18:45:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi1-f194.google.com with SMTP id 22-v6so1087745oiz.2 for ; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 09:45:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5cbb67b1-320d-f4ba-898d-7b7bf7921984@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > > > net/bnxt: update HWRM version > > net/bnxt: update HWRM version part 2 > > net/bnxt: update HWRM version part 3 > > Is there a logical to separation of part 1,2 & 3? > Commit logs are empty and there is nothing distinctive from commits. If the > separation is not logical but just physically split into 3 pieces I am for > merging them back with the "Update the HWRM API to version 1.9.2.53" > commit log. > Ferruh, It was a physical split into 3 patches. So merging them into one is ok. Thanks for checking. Ajit > > Or if there is a logic please clarify it on patch subject and commit log. > > I will wait your answer before moving on. > > Thanks, > ferruh >