From: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Bert van Leeuwen <bert.vanleeuwen@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethdev: check number of queues less than RTE_ETHDEV_QUEUE_STAT_CNTRS
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:32:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD+H9924VgQ=mqp3dGoJBpZFY_u3gkCv7C8xh4gib8j25JS-vQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1630834.YGmmObtqnA@xps13>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
wrote:
> 2016-11-11 09:16, Alejandro Lucero:
> > Thomas,
> >
> > We are wondering if you realize this patch fixes a bug with current
> ethdev
> > code as a device can have more than RTE_ETHDEV_QUEUE_STAT_CNTRS.
> >
> > Maybe the commit message is giving the wrong impression and as you
> > commented, it should just focus on the bug it fixes and to leave for
> > another email thread the discussion of how to solve the
> > RTE_ETHDEV_QUEUE_STAT_CNTRS
> > problem.
> >
> > Should we remove this from patchwork and to send another patch that way?
>
> Yes please. It was my first comment, we don't understand the exact issue
> you are fixing.
>
OK
> And I have a bad feeling it could break something else (really just a
> feeling).
> It is not the kind of patch we can apply the last day of a release.
> That's why I think it should wait 17.02.
>
>
Fine.
> Of course you can try to convince me and others to apply it as a last
> minute
> patch. But why are you sending a patch on the generic API in the last days?
>
>
We just found it a couple of days ago.
> Last argument: it is not fixing a regression of 16.11, so it is not so
> urgent.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-11 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-10 14:00 [PATCH] ethdev: check number of queues less than RTE_ETHDEV_QUEUE_STAT_CNTRS Alejandro Lucero
2016-11-10 14:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-10 15:43 ` Alejandro Lucero
2016-11-10 16:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-10 16:04 ` Alejandro Lucero
2016-11-11 9:16 ` Alejandro Lucero
2016-11-11 9:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-11 9:32 ` Alejandro Lucero [this message]
2016-11-11 9:48 ` Bert van Leeuwen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAD+H9924VgQ=mqp3dGoJBpZFY_u3gkCv7C8xh4gib8j25JS-vQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=alejandro.lucero@netronome.com \
--cc=bert.vanleeuwen@netronome.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).