From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alejandro Lucero Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfp: extend speed capabilities advertised Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:29:06 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1482149104-40805-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> <3dd84942-5c7b-5f3f-2760-a71f97dfcd6a@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: dev To: Ferruh Yigit Return-path: Received: from mail-ua0-f172.google.com (mail-ua0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06823FB1B for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:29:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ua0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 44so5171836uak.1 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 02:29:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 12/19/2016 6:00 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > I forgot one thing: to update the features file with this new one. > > > > I will wait for your feedback regarding the discussed problem for > > sending another version. > > I think it is good to go, please send updated version. > > OK > > > > <...> > > > > > Sorry, confused. Is it like following: > > > > " > > For new FW, there is no problem, it supports the range between > > 1G - 50G, > > and reports correct current speed. > > > > With old FW, device still can be set to speed range between 1G - > > 50G, > > but it doesn't report current speed correct, and DPDK driver > reports > > back to application as device current speed is 40G, without > really > > knowing the current speed. > > " > > > > > > Yes, that is. Should then I do anything else or the patch is right > > for you now? > > So, this patch is correct. > > But for the previous patch "net/nfp: report link speed using hardware > info", it would be nice to add above information into source as comment > and into commit log. > If you can, would you mind sending a new version of that patch? > > I'll do it. Thanks! > Thanks, > ferruh > > > > <...> >