From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyle Mestery Subject: Re: patchwork for dpdk.org? Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:31:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20140318135859.53fac97c@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140318135859.53fac97c-We1ePj4FEcvRI77zikRAJc56i+j3xesD0e7PPNI6Mm0@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Stephen Hemminger < stephen-OTpzqLSitTUnbdJkjeBofR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org> wrote: > Anybody considered setting up patchwork to track patches on this list? > > If not familiar, patchwork is a back end which maintainers and developers > can keep track of patches submitted and make sure of the status (accepted, > rejected, review, etc). > +1 for patchwork. In lieu of a more full-fledged CI/CD setup with Gerrit/Jenkins, patchwork is pretty nice.