From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: update data->eth_link status on start Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:21:36 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20180213225618.15693-1-3chas3@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Lu, Wenzhuo" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "Charles (Chas) Williams" To: "Zhang, Helin" Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f195.google.com (mail-io0-f195.google.com [209.85.223.195]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFFA4F90 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 19:21:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io0-f195.google.com with SMTP id x77so5440150ioi.2 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:21:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Zhang, Helin wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Chas Williams >> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 6:56 AM >> To: dev@dpdk.org >> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo; Ananyev, Konstantin; Charles (Chas) Williams >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: update data->eth_link status on start >> >> From: "Charles (Chas) Williams" >> >> dev->data->eth_link isn't updated until the first interrupt. If a >> link is carrier down, then this interrupt may never happen. Before we finished >> starting the PMD, call ixgbe_dev_link_update() to ensure we have a valid status. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chas Williams >> --- >> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c >> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c >> index 37eb668..27d29dc 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c >> @@ -2666,6 +2666,8 @@ ixgbe_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) >> if (err) >> goto error; >> >> + ixgbe_dev_link_update(dev, 0); > It is called in rte_eth_dev_start() if lsc is not enabled, > and it is not needed here to avoid any duplication. > BTW, did you see any issue or just check the code? Thanks! Yes, I see an issue with bonding. If LSC is enabled, then link_status isn't set until the first interrupt to update the link status. If a link is down, this interrupt may never happen result in link_status being somewhat undefined. > > /Helin > >> + >> skip_link_setup: >> >> if (rte_intr_allow_others(intr_handle)) { @@ -5033,6 +5035,8 @@ >> ixgbevf_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) >> >> ixgbevf_dev_rxtx_start(dev); >> >> + ixgbevf_dev_link_update(dev, 0); >> + >> /* check and configure queue intr-vector mapping */ >> if (rte_intr_cap_multiple(intr_handle) && >> dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.rxq) { >> -- >> 2.9.5 >