From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ixgbe: support UDP tunnel add/del
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:41:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CAG8AbRVvckvbJP8DMExXswNMmHi5Yuc3zMdR6UU2MppMMhjy0A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1452496044-17524-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
 <1452496044-17524-2-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
 <CAG8AbRVW0E8soti_daMuhaeQNKuH_Xf4tyN=VkB3-nX9n1e_Ww@mail.gmail.com>
 <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC090902A7D323@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com (mail-ob0-f176.google.com
 [209.85.214.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0198D35
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:41:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ba1so401802700obb.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:41:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC090902A7D323@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

> [Wenzhuo] The udp_tunnel_add and udp_tunnel_del have already existed. I
just use them. Honestly I agree with you they are not accurate name. Better
change them to udp_tunnel_port_add and udp_tunnel_port_del. But it should
be a ABI change if I=E2=80=99m not wrong. I think we can announce it this r=
elease
and change them in the next release. Would you agree?  Thanks.

Yes you are right.