From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shyam Shrivastav <shrivastav.shyam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPV4/IPV6 TCP/UDP Pseudo Header Checksum APIs
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 10:52:50 +0530
Message-ID: <CAGSp03ncwhn4ZxHtqnMoZEVJYQjc27bcWwVBvhwstpzyJWa67w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <A69E93D1CF6DFA4BA33FB8D8DAFFFD19035A0280@dggemm512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
 <CAGSp03nOTeCO8xdJ8wbhi+Z2_6kMAyhYYNQvV9BaFS=txFn4dg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: users <users@dpdk.org>, dev@dpdk.org, lichunhe@huawei.com,
 wangliefeng@huawei.com
To: lidejun1@huawei.com
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAGSp03nOTeCO8xdJ8wbhi+Z2_6kMAyhYYNQvV9BaFS=txFn4dg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Realized my answer is confusing, I meant to say that code is correct as
pseudo ipv4/ipv6 headers for the purpose of checksum calculations doesn't
include options or extension headers, see udp wiki or corresponding rfcs

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_Datagram_Protocol

On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 10:42 AM Shyam Shrivastav <
shrivastav.shyam@gmail.com> wrote:

> that is correct , pseudo header doesn't include ipv4 options or ipv6
> extension headers ..
>
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 9:02 AM lidejun <lidejun1@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Has anybody used the following two APIs calculating ipv4&ipv6 tcp/udp
>> pseudo header checksum=EF=BC=9F
>>
>> 1.    rte_ipv4_phdr_cksum
>>
>> 2.    rte_ipv6_phdr_cksum
>> The ipv4 version does not exclude ip options and ipv6 version does not
>> exclude extersion headers.
>>
>