From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCFCCCA471 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 13:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0630340668; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 15:03:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535A240661 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 15:03:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1759755799; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OE3vockcU2KJvysTCz8mFRZjLynCyQdGlUkBhcvIVXE=; b=RM3DDutZVwCtRRPAZzJ8uDfpcVTYYi5Dlv+JuCADWKkVelGW35/3ucgXiusrmWD6NBxvHq KqENu1PglhntnliecxE279GRXF3Kn6LPszT2+jgt5YadH7TlwR2Z7P942zZKXO4S3nanly GRD/zqx2PbeAthJWriBuI/+0gsdDcLs= Received: from mail-lf1-f70.google.com (mail-lf1-f70.google.com [209.85.167.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-274-tvuJfKA4Pjag8OaM-RCQ1g-1; Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:03:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tvuJfKA4Pjag8OaM-RCQ1g-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: tvuJfKA4Pjag8OaM-RCQ1g_1759755797 Received: by mail-lf1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-57cd230eb72so2946221e87.3 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2025 06:03:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1759755797; x=1760360597; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=OE3vockcU2KJvysTCz8mFRZjLynCyQdGlUkBhcvIVXE=; b=elXO/fi9D7vH3TA3qHRJTexeq7FihHfJJMVCFMDcIl1xsV6q0fCV9rM6iH/V/Ou5FX ufrPqj4RxEjCoZy/7qb0qrTXmwyFF2iyomNi4OG41584rhbri3YWvnY1zo0W7Qd56nR/ 59gYfZT9vag4LZG+F1jOHxMB+EH67TkkIGhE4QG7yNTEWlB0xtJ1H+meFdq3yrLIuf9O 5ZnNVydWfJnZUUICPRguiaLGbqjAXIBdypJBGUWNSJKkQ03z2kFN6ommdREp+Du9eHkp GoiY4Gh5PdxtkPJdi30kuo3vKmICC+qMckCklDteargjAbf+FQNBNJ+VguNJxLaNksTE wsnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxxv9JjKn3QJygxqxLkn8S3MdtljI8yUijKrcxFygHmbLJ8g/ub H61MomnpII9+pppHwkfmqRUca+NAWjMKg4ivfU2IsiKg9cWRZOUG1rC4dL1GSiUSUMFqwl3N62T FSxmi1l8dNXaYh4Pc1++pLkIgpDG8Lp1wP4j6N+IK3OX5FXI7JdKf6/7uGEddvvVvvaUCSKE01u +qwI7giQs0zBtB64hf8yU= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsSf+4OebGhI5y/FT7vDPBXgr+h53Um9t3nWhlIOKOx+YNlONVa+K1F9rRTLuL Zb6DRRV7V7Mj2fAKqaJYWpNC05tNPygvfM+gEZ1bA1HcwetCN8vqYoWh4dYKh8f9mEvzH6oZwwt ck8HXOVLjzdY/UtrzhlRNOAenwmM/P X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:b85:b0:57d:7343:3c6 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-58cb9a39359mr4458483e87.16.1759755796808; Mon, 06 Oct 2025 06:03:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEUSO6EFghBOR2Qc2qdItb6pk4jBwtHkDNRttArKFM2CVW1K9jpDIRGk+fgkhfBDSm0q3hyA9GiBwTaS6skyec= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:b85:b0:57d:7343:3c6 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-58cb9a39359mr4458451e87.16.1759755796292; Mon, 06 Oct 2025 06:03:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20251006124506.388456-1-thierry.herbelot@6wind.com> <8f14ef89-8f1a-42e7-8cf3-e609de32a98d@6wind.com> In-Reply-To: <8f14ef89-8f1a-42e7-8cf3-e609de32a98d@6wind.com> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 15:03:04 +0200 X-Gm-Features: AS18NWD-UK8_lIWQ8e0tBvNIjU20f1ZOx6DF1q1eVqbdTprzGb-gNoQ43jpWGuk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/intel/e1000: reduce the optimization level for gcc > 11 To: Thierry Herbelot Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon , Bruce Richardson , Stephen Hemminger , Olivier Matz X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: svgZEXhAEJCpzxmSZE8_xQaf1avGgyR1NUYqgqA5kok_1759755797 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 at 15:01, Thierry Herbelot wrote: > We can not expect a random developer to sprinkle memory barriers in the > PMD until testpmd seems to be working. Then random developer can report the issue and keep from trying to hide the issue which is not helping. -- David Marchand