From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1144D3B7EA for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2025 09:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9008C40270; Tue, 9 Dec 2025 10:45:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qv1-f43.google.com (mail-qv1-f43.google.com [209.85.219.43]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998674025F for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2025 10:45:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qv1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8823d5127daso56008656d6.0 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2025 01:45:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1765273507; x=1765878307; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=91b6vy1gwZeZKD4dneFdPQEzc1LXPWiILYRE5gezMqo=; b=dFmI28k2uFC9RMwjD8cvVTnh/gUUOQhvX4egcefNggXueA2VBtkoVui/3iuC4+CCGb 8CLg8/sPiZxITAPXsNzM628l7/gpwbjQMZgL9+rAd0JQPtbn1ZtluGhAtIXgzmOUHxFK r9TrH54qiP9PC8eAd27D789k7pAzWSO6rfS00oSlF230CtwBDHwg6fYzE/dSOx5f70e/ NJUStbKMX4ZZ3SOHrn9dpcs8LPQ4D9PhjtUBYjW1QdFzB7tgxwy3+M6FXpex+Pv9snnV x6MK+P8mHTG4qJwcKHflYqzfcPP6MCHW6r8Dfr6LaK2lcGmGZckK4iBN3n2Um/OqK7EE 11Aw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1765273507; x=1765878307; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=91b6vy1gwZeZKD4dneFdPQEzc1LXPWiILYRE5gezMqo=; b=Zoxz9NdFdYFxqlDVOaJKEHakg1pxA+V/QnRFf7C58Vg3Gp/9vo2uST289CNy/WqdDf usaPCQ593Nt8VtjowrTyyGjUacamFJgNAoKP7j+kWRr+vWJpjZtzwjct5fkFzq1V7CpR A5mcfMlK2cDE8qhHhdyRhOZ46EY51W3+X1cNMyfD/BIxUJDrSO5AVsOuGQFZveGYjqQl Vzi8DN1n9kpSOcT02/okvDrWEl77RLXHFj+/HDkULG/1DQUbIOb8PwBXLYn7FuwDikyb VO9+ch6q06Kq8gXsYoHnIYYxvDC1fiXc6QDrPBNfuF74qgGGSGhBjxt4fPUDbNUu8SVz tyeQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUI6hTLhSgYX8rqKunLKyugFIaPrI4JVo94YB4tVdMMoJSxXAa3BgtojQ68tHgTMnG+l14=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzOcjOUK5mOj0HhMcT9i8MD0eEO0mAxUfGKrgpXL8fnWMxRoJC0 8Plv/rCvTYxW/pd0vO7e0vykCDv7G7/For+2eGV/TBoBsLIzd2wtOw+DPKmPf7phSaowvJz9vfw c2K5ZF1Um6bG8mnBcHf4ZVtaxps2nP6o= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuADkpEG+QVUTAQNWpTbg4YNYVXX/swyeX5qfkvlFgE8amqaD7DPipNKo97afq ogw+mIbUGt0Wtx5p6Ex0aTO6hoBCKvZGwykkAEEf47Mt0RNGpcg1ZWvGLYoGYhHv2o7k3vUGc7z aLTkq2P5FklK+hOy0UGkxnOlIWUwqv2X+aEKRoj18NwTeN6uE5JxX/AkHrtR0YGCsx7iG3aLeD4 FfehchXgU4Jvvb1EDFWq01lTpYjmfxGHShrlvbunDLvUGCcysGEK8PR/i8BeQNzGir048WG X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHtyqUK/xO0j42pI0oX53qB/5VVRS7oVWsuN2yTTkWomEyNW6LKW6GA68UVwF0n1ln7dxZlzl9kxazuKjBzNfc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:e8e:b0:882:6797:3a67 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8883daba866mr179160806d6.13.1765273506877; Tue, 09 Dec 2025 01:45:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: coolwilled Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 17:44:55 +0800 X-Gm-Features: AQt7F2rJjJWjdEWau9yxFA9U2MLXr6EHSk4-YgW_i8igAkG5X-Xf7SlYGRponhI Message-ID: Subject: Ask help for DPAA_SEC: test_pdcp almost all cases failed To: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com, g.singh@nxp.com, dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004f164f064581c403" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000004f164f064581c403 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, NXP and dpdk.org users and developers Did anyone run test_pdcp on DPAA_SEC ? I have a NXP LS1046A board. I have configured DPAA sec and 4 dpaa_sec crypto_dev can be found in rte_eal_init(). I run dpdk-test from dpdk.org git commit = b287e404643a (24.11.3) and almost all cases execpt one PDCP status report case failed. I also run app/dpdk-test-crypto-perf throughput test with dpaa_sec. It only measures throughput and doesn't check correctness. I find the session is created with rte_security_session_create() in app/test-crypto-perf/cperfops.c for CPERF_PDCP. And session is created with rte_cryptodev_sym_session_create() in lib/pdcp/pdcp_crypto.c . Which type of session should be created ? How the test_pdcp can succeed in LS1046A DPAA_SEC ? Thanks a lot. --0000000000004f164f064581c403 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi, NXP and dpdk.org = users and developers

Did anyone run test_pdcp on D= PAA_SEC ?

I have a NXP LS1046A board.


--0000000000004f164f064581c403--