From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Blunck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] ethdev: support attach vdev in secondary process Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:26:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1503654052-84730-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> <1506606959-76230-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> <1506606959-76230-10-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: dev , Bruce Richardson , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , Thomas Monjalon , yliu@fridaylinux.org, Maxime Coquelin , Tetsuya Mukawa , Ferruh Yigit To: Jianfeng Tan Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f195.google.com (mail-wr0-f195.google.com [209.85.128.195]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CE31B203 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:26:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr0-f195.google.com with SMTP id z1so9710421wre.1 for ; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 07:26:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1506606959-76230-10-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Jianfeng Tan wrote: > When vdev driver requests an ethdev entry in secondary process, > we will identify the correct entry in rte_eth_dev_data array > and return the correct entry in the rte_eth_devices arrays. > > Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan > --- > lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_vdev.h | 26 +++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_vdev.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_vdev.h > index 4d2c3e2..460749b 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_vdev.h > +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_vdev.h > @@ -58,25 +58,29 @@ rte_eth_vdev_allocate(struct rte_vdev_device *dev, size_t private_data_size) > struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev; > const char *name = rte_vdev_device_name(dev); > > - eth_dev = rte_eth_dev_allocate(name); > - if (!eth_dev) > - return NULL; > - > - if (private_data_size) { > - eth_dev->data->dev_private = rte_zmalloc_socket(name, > - private_data_size, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, > - dev->device.numa_node); > - if (!eth_dev->data->dev_private) { > - rte_eth_dev_release_port(eth_dev); > + if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) { > + eth_dev = rte_eth_dev_allocate(name); > + if (!eth_dev) > return NULL; > + > + if (private_data_size) { > + eth_dev->data->dev_private = rte_zmalloc_socket(name, > + private_data_size, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, > + dev->device.numa_node); > + if (!eth_dev->data->dev_private) { > + rte_eth_dev_release_port(eth_dev); > + return NULL; > + } > } > + } else { > + eth_dev = rte_eth_dev_attach_secondary(name); I don't see the point why the secondary process should call rte_eth_vdev_allocate() in the first place. The driver needs to setup the IPC anyway so it should just call rte_eth_dev_attach_secondary() instead. > } > > eth_dev->device = &dev->device; > eth_dev->intr_handle = NULL; > - > eth_dev->data->kdrv = RTE_KDRV_NONE; > eth_dev->data->numa_node = dev->device.numa_node; > + > return eth_dev; > } > > -- > 2.7.4 >