From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] kill global pci device id list
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:07:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CALwxeUtP-wj3uDEQ7mcG-affz09WqN2jxsa0rG5N3oKwTNR9_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1453120248-28274-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com>
 <1461156236-25349-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
 "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>,
 Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E4D293B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:08:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id u206so118604173wme.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1461156236-25349-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:43 PM, David Marchand
<david.marchand@6wind.com> wrote:
> - not storing the pci ids in a dedicated section anymore, pci drivers are
>   exported and parsed by a quickly written (and naive) tool

Rethinking about this, this part won't do.
Stripping symbols breaks it, and I had to go some gymnastics to get
the symbols, while having exported information sanitised as strings in
a dedicated section constructed at build time would be saner.
Yes, this really sounds like modinfo ...

Volunteers ?


-- 
David Marchand