From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Marchand Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ethdev: export rte_eth_dev_is_detachable function Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 08:49:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1446108903-14412-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> <1446550500-24029-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> <1446550500-24029-3-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> <4007343.9j0i5nBSyu@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266BC8F9B for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 08:49:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by obctp1 with SMTP id tp1so33279304obc.2 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 23:49:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4007343.9j0i5nBSyu@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > After more thoughts, we do not need such function to query a capability. > The Bernard's patch add a bit-field to expose such capabilities. > So this patchset is rejected, sorry. > As discussed offline, as long as those capabilities do the job, I am fine with it. Thanks. -- David Marchand