From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] e1000: move pci device ids to driver
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:35:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CALwxeUtjXv2m4KDizNT4JoZijaxNgmDPN=bFSL0SR0fOsttCBw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1453120248-28274-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com>
 <2858831.tSF8KXeB50@xps13> <20160711053326.GW26521@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <1698058.nWbIbKdPp2@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
 "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>,
 Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>,
 Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
 Rasesh Mody <rasesh.mody@qlogic.com>, johndale@cisco.om,
 Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98D619F5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:36:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id o80so45537751wme.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1698058.nWbIbKdPp2@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hello all,

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Thomas Monjalon
<thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:
> 2016-07-11 13:33, Yuanhan Liu:
>> I'm not quite sure I understood it well: are you asking us to resend
>> what David has already send, say me for resending the virtio part?
>>
>> If so, what's the point of that? What's worse, it's likely to fail
>> apply (due to conflicts), as every one of us make a patch based on
>> the same base while touching some same files.
>
> Good point.
> There were some changes since the patches from David (and a new bnxt).
> That's why I was thinking to ask maintainers to take care of this change.
> But maybe it's better to do the change in one patchset.
> David, ok to refresh these patches?

Now that we have a modinfo-like infra and the test code is exempt from
igb pci ids, all that remains (to fully get rid of this header) are
bypass api and kni/ethtool.
So the deal with Thomas is that I refresh those patches letting igb
and ixgbe pmd as is.

Will send this later.


-- 
David Marchand