From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Marchand Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i40e: Enlarge the number of supported queues Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:41:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1442760674-19482-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> <1442760674-19482-3-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , yulong.pei@intel.com To: Helin Zhang , "Richardson, Bruce" Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com (mail-oi0-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979A311A2 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:41:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by oiev17 with SMTP id v17so53795310oie.1 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:41:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1442760674-19482-3-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hello Helin, Bruce, On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Helin Zhang wrote: > It enlarges the number of supported queues to hardware allowed > maximum. There was a software limitation of 64 per physical port > which is not reasonable. > I looked at the commit that introduced this limitation, can't we just get rid of this ? The primary process should know the current max queue number and initialises the array properly before any secondary process tries to set any callback, or tries to call rx/tx functions. Did I miss something ? -- David Marchand