From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_M=C4=99dala?= <jan@semihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] ena: fix memory management issue
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 19:03:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CANw_3ZdnUo9+8Ba7QtNGTrOqsJkpqN6P+Kpa_je6S=_RCp544A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1466510763-19569-6-git-send-email-jan@semihalf.com>
 <1467299099-32498-1-git-send-email-jan@semihalf.com>
 <1467299099-32498-6-git-send-email-jan@semihalf.com>
 <20160704162750.GB23380@bricha3-MOBL3> <20160705161346.GB26504@bricha3-MOBL3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
 Alexander Matushevsky <matua@amazon.com>, Jakub Palider <jpa@semihalf.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-vk0-f49.google.com (mail-vk0-f49.google.com
 [209.85.213.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D11C69A4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  5 Jul 2016 19:03:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-vk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id m127so213106281vkb.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160705161346.GB26504@bricha3-MOBL3>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Yes, this is correct.

  Jan

2016-07-05 18:13 GMT+02:00 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>:

> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 05:27:50PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 05:04:58PM +0200, Jan Medala wrote:
> > > After allocating memzone it's required to zeroize memory in it.
> > > Freeing memzone with function dedicated for memoryzones.
> > >
> >
> > Can you provide a fixes line for this patch?
> >
>
> From looking at git blame, it looks to be:
> Fixes: 9ba7981ec992 ("ena: add communication layer for DPDK")
>
> Please confirm that is ok.
>
> /Bruce
>
>